Journal of
Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics
HOME   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   RELATED PUBLICATIONS   |   SEARCH     CONTACT US
 



ISSN: 1690-4524 (Online)


Peer Reviewed Journal via three different mandatory reviewing processes, since 2006, and, from September 2020, a fourth mandatory peer-editing has been added.

Indexed by
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)Benefits of supplying DOAJ with metadata:
  • DOAJ's statistics show more than 900 000 page views and 300 000 unique visitors a month to DOAJ from all over the world.
  • Many aggregators, databases, libraries, publishers and search portals collect our free metadata and include it in their products. Examples are Scopus, Serial Solutions and EBSCO.
  • DOAJ is OAI compliant and once an article is in DOAJ, it is automatically harvestable.
  • DOAJ is OpenURL compliant and once an article is in DOAJ, it is automatically linkable.
  • Over 95% of the DOAJ Publisher community said that DOAJ is important for increasing their journal's visibility.
  • DOAJ is often cited as a source of quality, open access journals in research and scholarly publishing circles.
JSCI Supplies DOAJ with Meta Data
, Academic Journals Database, and Google Scholar


Listed in
Cabell Directory of Publishing Opportunities and in Ulrich’s Periodical Directory


Published by
The International Institute of Informatics and Cybernetics


Re-Published in
Academia.edu
(A Community of about 40.000.000 Academics)


Honorary Editorial Advisory Board's Chair
William Lesso (1931-2015)

Editor-in-Chief
Nagib C. Callaos


Sponsored by
The International Institute of
Informatics and Systemics

www.iiis.org
 

Editorial Advisory Board

Quality Assurance

Editors

Journal's Reviewers
Call for Special Articles
 

Description and Aims

Submission of Articles

Areas and Subareas

Information to Contributors

Editorial Peer Review Methodology

Integrating Reviewing Processes


Improving Argumentation Skills through AI-Driven Dialogues: A Transdisciplinary Approach
Birgit Oberer, Alptekin Erkollar
(pages: 1-17)

Overcoming Obstacles to Interdisciplinary Research: Empirical Insights and Strategies
Cristo Leon, James Lipuma
(pages: 18-34)

Knowledge Integration in Students After Transdisciplinary Communication with the Oldest Old
Sonja Ehret
(pages: 35-47)

Generative Artificial Intelligence ChatGPT in Education: Challenges and Opportunities
Bilquis Ferdousi
(pages: 48-64)

IT Ecosystem in a Globalized World
Olga Bernikova, Daria Frolova
(pages: 65-77)

Enhancing Pedagogy and Biblical Exegesis with Emotional Intelligence
Russell Jay Hendel
(pages: 78-112)

The Necessity for Transdisciplinary Communication in Law-Making
Adrian Leka, Brunilda Jani Haxhiu
(pages: 113-123)

The Facilitation of Online Learning for Middle-aged Employees
Gita Aulia Nurani, Ya-Hui Lee
(pages: 124-145)

The Dangers of Aestheticized Education: A Return to Curiosity in a Curated World
Juan David Campolargo
(pages: 146-150)

Navigating Transdisciplinary Communication: A Graduate Student's Perspective
Sirimuvva Pathikonda, Cristo Leon, James Lipuma
(pages: 151-172)


 

Abstracts

 


ABSTRACT


Aurel_AI: Automating an Institutional Help Desk Using an LLM Chatbot

Diego Ordóñez-Camacho, Rafael Melgarejo-Heredia, Mohsen Abbasi, Lucía González-Solis


The Aurel_AI research project was born from the need to implement a virtual help desk for a university, providing accurate organizational information to both internal and external clients. The information includes details about academic programs, regulations, processes, and personnel. Aurel_AI is part of a broader research program on the use of AI in academia. Traditional solutions for a help desk, such as telephone call centers, present quality and efficiency issues that are difficult to solve. Call center staff generally lack comprehensive knowledge about the institution, rely on specific information that is sometimes outdated, require additional systems for information retrieval, and experience high turnover rates. This leads to associated costs and issues related with outdated information, resulting in inaccurate responses and long waiting times. Generative artificial intelligence models, known as Large Language Models (LLMs), offer an interesting alternative for an automated virtual help desk. These models can understand even vague and poorly structured questions and generate reasonably appropriate answers. However, they are not without flaws, as they tend to present issues like "hallucinations" when the required information is not present in their training data. To minimize this problem, it is crucial to ensure that the model has precise and comprehensive information, which needs a specific methodology for information collection, validation, and updating. Base models require an adaptation process to be used for specific cases, for which techniques like Fine-Tuning and Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) exist. Fine-tuning retrains a model’s weights with new specific information, while RAG uses both proprietary information—in this case, from the university—and publicly available internet data. Both techniques have pros and cons that need to be evaluated to select the most suitable option. They also demand appropriate and specialized infrastructure, which is often expensive. Thus, another challenge is to find a balance between suitable equipment and reasonable costs. The final system, from the user’s perspective, must be accurate, flexible, and adaptable to deliver a satisfactory experience. As the results show, Aurel_AI represents an advance in the digitalization of educational services, standing out for its ability to generate accurate and personalized responses. However, its current limitations, such as handling concurrent queries and hallucinations, underscore the need for adjustments to both infrastructure and data processing methodology. With strategic improvements, the system has the potential to consolidate itself as a replicable model for multiple university digital services.

Full Text