Journal of
Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics
HOME   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   RELATED PUBLICATIONS   |   SEARCH     CONTACT US
 



ISSN: 1690-4524 (Online)


Peer Reviewed Journal via three different mandatory reviewing processes, since 2006, and, from September 2020, a fourth mandatory peer-editing has been added.

Indexed by
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)Benefits of supplying DOAJ with metadata:
  • DOAJ's statistics show more than 900 000 page views and 300 000 unique visitors a month to DOAJ from all over the world.
  • Many aggregators, databases, libraries, publishers and search portals collect our free metadata and include it in their products. Examples are Scopus, Serial Solutions and EBSCO.
  • DOAJ is OAI compliant and once an article is in DOAJ, it is automatically harvestable.
  • DOAJ is OpenURL compliant and once an article is in DOAJ, it is automatically linkable.
  • Over 95% of the DOAJ Publisher community said that DOAJ is important for increasing their journal's visibility.
  • DOAJ is often cited as a source of quality, open access journals in research and scholarly publishing circles.
JSCI Supplies DOAJ with Meta Data
, Academic Journals Database, and Google Scholar


Listed in
Cabell Directory of Publishing Opportunities and in Ulrich’s Periodical Directory


Published by
The International Institute of Informatics and Cybernetics


Re-Published in
Academia.edu
(A Community of about 40.000.000 Academics)


Honorary Editorial Advisory Board's Chair
William Lesso (1931-2015)

Editor-in-Chief
Nagib C. Callaos


Sponsored by
The International Institute of
Informatics and Systemics

www.iiis.org
 

Editorial Advisory Board

Quality Assurance

Editors

Journal's Reviewers
Call for Special Articles
 

Description and Aims

Submission of Articles

Areas and Subareas

Information to Contributors

Editorial Peer Review Methodology

Integrating Reviewing Processes


Improving Argumentation Skills through AI-Driven Dialogues: A Transdisciplinary Approach
Birgit Oberer, Alptekin Erkollar
(pages: 1-17)

Overcoming Obstacles to Interdisciplinary Research: Empirical Insights and Strategies
Cristo Leon, James Lipuma
(pages: 18-34)

Knowledge Integration in Students After Transdisciplinary Communication with the Oldest Old
Sonja Ehret
(pages: 35-47)

Generative Artificial Intelligence ChatGPT in Education: Challenges and Opportunities
Bilquis Ferdousi
(pages: 48-64)

IT Ecosystem in a Globalized World
Olga Bernikova, Daria Frolova
(pages: 65-77)

Enhancing Pedagogy and Biblical Exegesis with Emotional Intelligence
Russell Jay Hendel
(pages: 78-112)

The Necessity for Transdisciplinary Communication in Law-Making
Adrian Leka, Brunilda Jani Haxhiu
(pages: 113-123)

The Facilitation of Online Learning for Middle-aged Employees
Gita Aulia Nurani, Ya-Hui Lee
(pages: 124-145)

The Dangers of Aestheticized Education: A Return to Curiosity in a Curated World
Juan David Campolargo
(pages: 146-150)

Navigating Transdisciplinary Communication: A Graduate Student's Perspective
Sirimuvva Pathikonda, Cristo Leon, James Lipuma
(pages: 151-172)


 

Abstracts

 


ABSTRACT


Role of the Bridge Maker in Innovation Ecosystems

Kristaps Banga, Elina Gaile-Sarkane


This research explores the crucial role of bridge makers in fostering the success of open innovations within innovation ecosystems. Emphasizing governance structures, this study highlights the importance of creating synergies among participants through effective intermediaries. Bridge makers act as connectors, facilitators, and integrators, crucial for fostering collaboration among diverse stakeholders, aligning interests, and overcoming barriers to innovation. By integrating the bridge maker role into ecosystem strategies, stakeholders can ensure that the connections formed are not only numerous but also robust, inclusive, and capable of driving long-term innovation and collaboration.

Given the fragmented nature of recent literature on the role of bridge makers, and the various terminologies used to describe similar roles, this research aims to provide a clear definition and comprehensive understanding of the bridge maker’s role. The objective is to analyze different aspects and names attributed to this role within the context of innovation ecosystems.

This paper concludes by discussing future research avenues that can build on the developed role typology, shedding further light on the process of open innovation ecosystem genesis. By incorporating the bridge maker role into the various ecosystem models, this research suggests that enhanced connectivity and synergy can be achieved, benefiting the entire ecosystem.

Full Text