Peer Reviewed Journal via three different mandatory reviewing processes, since 2006, and, from September 2020, a fourth mandatory peer-editing has been added.
Indexed byDOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)Benefits of supplying DOAJ with metadata:DOAJ's statistics show more than 900 000 page views and 300 000 unique visitors a month to DOAJ from all over the world. Many aggregators, databases, libraries, publishers and search portals collect our free metadata and include it in their products. Examples are Scopus, Serial Solutions and EBSCO . DOAJ is OAI compliant and once an article is in DOAJ, it is automatically harvestable. DOAJ is OpenURL compliant and once an article is in DOAJ, it is automatically linkable. Over 95% of the DOAJ Publisher community said that DOAJ is important for increasing their journal's visibility. DOAJ is often cited as a source of quality, open access journals in research and scholarly publishing circles. JSCI Supplies DOAJ with Meta Data
, Academic Journals Database, and Google Scholar
Listed inCabell Directory of Publishing Opportunities and in Ulrich’s Periodical Directory Published by
The International Institute of Informatics and Cybernetics Re-Published in
Academia.edu
Utilization of Artificial Intelligence by Students in Interdisciplinary Field of Biomedical Engineering Shigehiro Hashimoto (pages: 1-5) Transdisciplinary Applications of Data Visualization and Data Mining Techniques as Represented for Human Diseases Richard S. Segall (pages: 6-15) Beyond Status Quo: Why is Transdisciplinary Communication Instrumental in Innovation? James Lipuma , Cristo Leon (pages: 16-20) How We Can Locate Validatable Foundations of Life Themes Jeremy Horne (pages: 21-32) Bringing Discipline into Transdisciplinary Communications -The ISO 56000 Family of Innovation Standards- Rick Fernandez , William Swart (pages: 33-39) To AI Is Human: How AI Tools with Their Imperfections Enhance Learning Martin Cwiakala (pages: 40-46) Knowledge, Learning and Transdisciplinary Communication in the Evolution of the Contemporary World Rita Micarelli , Giorgio Pizziolo (pages: 47-52) Human Complexity vs. Machine Linearity: Tug-of-War Between Two Realities Coexisting in Precarious Balance Paolo Barile , Clara Bassano , Paolo Piciocchi (pages: 53-62) A Cybernetic Metric Approach to Course Preparation Russell Jay Hendel (pages: 63-70) The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Education John Jenq (pages: 71-76) Bridging the Gap: Harnessing the Power of Machine Learning and Big Data for Media Research Li-jing Arthur Chang (pages: 77-84) Image Processing, Computer Vision, Data Visualization, and Data Mining for Transdisciplinary Visual Communication: What Are the Differences and Which Should or Could You Use? Richard S. Segall (pages: 85-92) Identification – The Essence of Education Jeremy Horne (pages: 93-99) The Greek-Roman Theatre in the Mediterranean Area Maria Rosaria D’acierno Canonici Cammino (pages: 100-108) Examination of AI and Conventional Teaching Approaches in Cultivating Critical Thinking Skills in High School Students Luis Castillo (pages: 109-112) Thoughts, Labyrinths, and Torii Maurício Vieira Kritz (pages: 113-119) Can Two Human Intelligences (HIs or Noes ) and Two Artificial Intelligences (AIs) Get Involved in Interlinguistic Communication? – A Transdisciplinary Quest Ekaterini Nikolarea (pages: 120-128)
ABSTRACT
Multi Institutional Semi-Structured Learning Environments
A description of two effective and novel collaborative learning environments that support engineering and technological innovation is provided. While offering great value to systems, and systems of systems, engineering practice, these environments are not adequately described by either of these perspectives. Instead these multi-institutional semi-structured learning environments are best described using an informing sciences perspective. Evidence is presented that these environments not only fulfill the definition of an informing system but may represent two of the more complete and dynamic instances of such systems with each simultaneously informing practice, research and teaching in a substantive manner that also produces engineering and technological innovation. The potential for these environments to serve as laboratories for both traditional and participatory research for those studying informing systems is suggested.
Full Text
