Journal of
Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics
HOME   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   RELATED PUBLICATIONS   |   SEARCH     CONTACT US
 



ISSN: 1690-4524 (Online)


Peer Reviewed Journal via three different mandatory reviewing processes, since 2006, and, from September 2020, a fourth mandatory peer-editing has been added.

Indexed by
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)Benefits of supplying DOAJ with metadata:
  • DOAJ's statistics show more than 900 000 page views and 300 000 unique visitors a month to DOAJ from all over the world.
  • Many aggregators, databases, libraries, publishers and search portals collect our free metadata and include it in their products. Examples are Scopus, Serial Solutions and EBSCO.
  • DOAJ is OAI compliant and once an article is in DOAJ, it is automatically harvestable.
  • DOAJ is OpenURL compliant and once an article is in DOAJ, it is automatically linkable.
  • Over 95% of the DOAJ Publisher community said that DOAJ is important for increasing their journal's visibility.
  • DOAJ is often cited as a source of quality, open access journals in research and scholarly publishing circles.
JSCI Supplies DOAJ with Meta Data
, Academic Journals Database, and Google Scholar


Listed in
Cabell Directory of Publishing Opportunities and in Ulrich’s Periodical Directory


Published by
The International Institute of Informatics and Cybernetics


Re-Published in
Academia.edu
(A Community of about 40.000.000 Academics)


Honorary Editorial Advisory Board's Chair
William Lesso (1931-2015)

Editor-in-Chief
Nagib C. Callaos


Sponsored by
The International Institute of
Informatics and Systemics

www.iiis.org
 

Editorial Advisory Board

Quality Assurance

Editors

Journal's Reviewers
Call for Special Articles
 

Description and Aims

Submission of Articles

Areas and Subareas

Information to Contributors

Editorial Peer Review Methodology

Integrating Reviewing Processes


Improving Argumentation Skills through AI-Driven Dialogues: A Transdisciplinary Approach
Birgit Oberer, Alptekin Erkollar
(pages: 1-17)

Overcoming Obstacles to Interdisciplinary Research: Empirical Insights and Strategies
Cristo Leon, James Lipuma
(pages: 18-34)

Knowledge Integration in Students After Transdisciplinary Communication with the Oldest Old
Sonja Ehret
(pages: 35-47)

Generative Artificial Intelligence ChatGPT in Education: Challenges and Opportunities
Bilquis Ferdousi
(pages: 48-64)

IT Ecosystem in a Globalized World
Olga Bernikova, Daria Frolova
(pages: 65-77)

Enhancing Pedagogy and Biblical Exegesis with Emotional Intelligence
Russell Jay Hendel
(pages: 78-112)

The Necessity for Transdisciplinary Communication in Law-Making
Adrian Leka, Brunilda Jani Haxhiu
(pages: 113-123)

The Facilitation of Online Learning for Middle-aged Employees
Gita Aulia Nurani, Ya-Hui Lee
(pages: 124-145)

The Dangers of Aestheticized Education: A Return to Curiosity in a Curated World
Juan David Campolargo
(pages: 146-150)

Navigating Transdisciplinary Communication: A Graduate Student's Perspective
Sirimuvva Pathikonda, Cristo Leon, James Lipuma
(pages: 151-172)


 

Abstracts

 


ABSTRACT


Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) for Evaluating Knowledge Areas of Advanced Certificate in Engineering Taught in South Africa

Lusiwe Maduna, Masengo Ilunga, Zakithi Dube


In order to evaluate the consistency of the knowledge areas (KAs) covered in the advanced certificate in engineering (AdvCertEng) course, this study used the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) technique. Both universities of technology and comprehensive universities in South Africa offer this subject. The primary requirements that an engineering programme should meet for the purposes of creating and implementing FAHP, are knowledge areas. The opinions of experts and decision-makers are prone to some subjectivity, imprecision, even some uncertainty and ambiguity, which results in fuzziness. Triangular fuzzy numbers (TFN1) between (1,1,1) and (9,9,9) are used to establish fuzzy pairwise comparisons between criteria on a qualitative level, whilst FAHP is used to calculate the weights of the criterion on a quantitative one. In this investigation, TFNs linked to a fuzzy distance from the crisp values of 1 are employed, and the related FAHP is denoted as FAHP1. The credit weight for each knowledge area is then calculated uniformly using the same method. AdvCertEng's existing knowledge area credit weights were generally confirmed using FAHP1. FAHP and ECSA's credit weights did, however, differ by minuscule amounts.

Full Text