Journal of
Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics
HOME   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   RELATED PUBLICATIONS   |   SEARCH     CONTACT US
 



ISSN: 1690-4524 (Online)


Peer Reviewed Journal via three different mandatory reviewing processes, since 2006, and, from September 2020, a fourth mandatory peer-editing has been added.

Indexed by
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)Benefits of supplying DOAJ with metadata:
  • DOAJ's statistics show more than 900 000 page views and 300 000 unique visitors a month to DOAJ from all over the world.
  • Many aggregators, databases, libraries, publishers and search portals collect our free metadata and include it in their products. Examples are Scopus, Serial Solutions and EBSCO.
  • DOAJ is OAI compliant and once an article is in DOAJ, it is automatically harvestable.
  • DOAJ is OpenURL compliant and once an article is in DOAJ, it is automatically linkable.
  • Over 95% of the DOAJ Publisher community said that DOAJ is important for increasing their journal's visibility.
  • DOAJ is often cited as a source of quality, open access journals in research and scholarly publishing circles.
JSCI Supplies DOAJ with Meta Data
, Academic Journals Database, and Google Scholar


Listed in
Cabell Directory of Publishing Opportunities and in Ulrich’s Periodical Directory


Re-Published in
Academia.edu
(A Community of about 40.000.000 Academics)


Honorary Editorial Advisory Board's Chair
William Lesso (1931-2015)

Editor-in-Chief
Nagib C. Callaos


Sponsored by
The International Institute of
Informatics and Systemics

www.iiis.org
 

Editorial Advisory Board

Quality Assurance

Editors

Journal's Reviewers
Call for Special Articles
 

Description and Aims

Submission of Articles

Areas and Subareas

Information to Contributors

Editorial Peer Review Methodology

Integrating Reviewing Processes


Philosophy and Cybernetics: Questions and Issues
Thomas Marlowe, Fr. Joseph R. Laracy
(pages: 1-23)

Reconceiving Cybernetics in Light of Thomistic Realism
John T. Laracy, Fr. Joseph R. Laracy
(pages: 24-39)

Nascent Cybernetics, Humanism, and Some Scientistic Challenges
Zachary M. Mabee
(pages: 40-52)

Kant, Cybernetics, and Cybersecurity: Integration and Secure Computation
Jon K. Burmeister, Ziyuan Meng
(pages: 53-78)

Interplay Between Cybernetics and Philosophy as an Essential Condition for Learning
Maria Jakubik
(pages: 79-97)

Towards a General Theory of Change: A Cybernetic and Philosophical Understanding
Gianfranco Minati
(pages: 98-109)

Artificial Intelligence and Human Intellect
Víctor Velarde-Mayol
(pages: 110-127)

The Philosophy of Cybernetics
Jeremy Horne
(pages: 128-159)

Cybernetics and Philosophy in a Translation of Oedipus the King and Its Performance
Ekaterini Nikolarea
(pages: 160-190)

Linguistic Philosophy of Cyberspace
Rusudan Makhachashvili, Ivan Semenist
(pages: 191-207)

Systems Philosophy and Cybernetics
Nagib Callaos
(pages: 208-284)


 

Abstracts

 


ABSTRACT


Real-Time, On-Site, Machine Learning Identification Methodology of Intrinsic Human Cancers Based on Infra-Red Spectral Analysis – Clinical Results

Yaniv Cohen, Arkadi Zilberman, Ben Zion Dekel, Evgenii Krouk


In this work we present a real-time (RT), on-site, machine-learning based methodology for identifying intrinsic human cancers. The presented approach is reliable, effective, cost-effective and non-invasive and based on the Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy - a vibrational method with the ability to detect changes as a result of molecular vibration bonds using infrared (IR) radiation in human tissues and cells.

Medical IR optical system (IROS) is a table-top device for real-time tissue diagnosis that utilizes FTIR spectroscopy and the attenuated total reflectance (ATR) principle to accurately diagnose the tissue. The ATR measurement principle is performed utilizing a radiation source and a Fourier transform (FT) spectrometer. Information acquired and analyzed in accordance with this method provides accurate details of biochemical composition and pathologic condition of the tissue.

The combined device and method were used for RT diagnosis and characterization of normal and pathological tissues ex-vivo/ in-vitro. Therefore, the presented device can be used in close conjunction with a surgical procedure

The solution methodology is to select a set of "features" that can be used to differentiate between cancer, normal and other pathologies using an appropriate classifier. These features serve as spectral signatures (intensity levels) at specific values of measured FTIR-ATR spectral responses.

Excellent results were achieved by applying the following three machine learning (ML) based classification methods to 76 wet samples: Partial least square regression (PLSR) and Principal component regression (PCR)

Both of the methods (PCR & PLSR) show a high performance to classify "Cancer" or "non-Cancer"; Correct Classification: 100 %; Incorrect Classification: 0.0 %.

Naive Bayesian classifier (NBC); Shows a high performance to classify "Cancer" or "non-Cancer" (benign); Correct Classification: 100 %; Incorrect Classification: 0.0 %.

Full Text